A post from this blog's past: https://saintsontheloose.blogspot.com/2015/06/car-tags.html was about licensed "vanity"car tags with unusual readings which the driver may use for an extra fee above the required standard registration fee.
In the parking deck where I work, I recently saw a new tag which intrigued me: UN4GIVN. Using the English language letters and numbers this would transliterate as "unforgiven." What in the world could this mean?
After considering multiple possibilities, including a reference to a movie title or that the driver was a defiantly unrepentant philanderer, I decided that the most likely meaning was as a sarcastic insult to Christians, who often describe themselves as forgiven sinners.
Showing posts with label insult. Show all posts
Showing posts with label insult. Show all posts
Friday, June 14, 2019
UN4GIVN
Labels:
atheism,
car tags,
forgiveness,
insult,
movies,
sarcasm,
transliteration
Wednesday, February 10, 2016
Film Comment: Kike Like Me
The title of this film is a play on the name of John Griffin’s 1964 book, Black Like Me. Griffin darkened his skin so he could convincingly live for a time as a black man and then wrote of his experiences.
“Kike” is an ethnic slur word used to insult Jews. There are several possible explanations for the origin of the word, but one of the most likely is offered by Leo Rosten in his 1968 book, The Joys of Yiddish.
Rosten says that many of the Jews entering the United States at the immigration center at Ellis Island in New York were illiterate. A common practice at the time was for the recording clerk to write the persons name and then for the illiterate person to place “his mark,” an X, between the personal name and the surname.
Many Jews thought the X looked like a cross and refused to use it. Instead they wrote an O, a circle, which in Yiddish is “kikel” or “keikl.”
Kike Like Me (2007) is narrated by Jamie Kastner who presents the film as an examination of what it means to be Jewish in the modern world. Kastner travels to Jerusalem, Berlin, Poland, Paris, and the Auschwitz death camp. He becomes increasingly shocked and sarcastic as he sees more. He is disgusted to find that Auschwitz has a tourist souvenir shop.
Christians often forget that all of the first Christians were Jewish and that it is impossible to understand Christianity without understanding its Jewish origins. What does it mean to be perceived as Jewish? Watch this film if you dare.
Labels:
African American,
Auschwitz,
Berlin,
black man,
cross,
ethnic slur,
film commentary,
insult,
Jerusalem,
Judaism,
kike,
Paris,
Poland,
sarcasm,
Yiddish
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Rick and Bubba Cut Ties With World Vision
Rick and Bubba are comedians, authors, and nationally
syndicated radio personalities who are openly and outspokenly Christian. They have been ardent supporters of
World Vision, an international Christian charity which fights child poverty by
sponsoring needy children. They
have abruptly cut ties with World Vision after their personal friend, the
organization’s president Richard Stearns, told Christianity Today that World
Vision is changing their employment policies. They previously required employees to remain faithful within
marriage, abstinent outside of marriage, and only recognized heterosexual
marriages. The new personnel
policy does not overtly endorse same sex marriage but includes legal same sex
marriages.
Readers of this blog understand that the blog is written
from an orthodox Trinitarian Christian understanding based on a very high view
of scripture. The biblical
standard for marriage is one man married to one woman. It is clear that the Bible does not in
any way condone the practice of homosexuality. (1 Corinthians 6:9-10)
What Rick and Bubba have done is not “hate speech” or
“homophobia.” Christians should
not hate (1 John 3:15) and we do not have a spirit of fear (2 Timothy
1:7). The historical orthodox
position is admittedly absolutist.
The biblical claim is that God is the Absolute Truth and that He is the
only arbiter of that truth.
Moral relativism, of which I have spoken before, is a very
recent development which challenges the idea of Absolute Truth. Advocates of moral relativism see
traditional understandings of numerous issues to be repressive and
oppressive. They see Truth, if it
exists at all, as being determined by the individual or by a community of agreeing
individuals.
Several Christian denominations have been influenced by the
philosophy of moral relativism and have adopted reinterpretations of historic
doctrines in an effort to become more “relevant” to the modern world. Some include openly homosexual members
and a few have no problem with sexual relationships (heterosexual and
homosexual) outside of marriage if the sexuality is in the concept of a
“committed relationship.”
I personally know several homosexual Christians who are
aware of my stand on this matter.
We do not hate or fear one another (“homophobia” is an insult word); we
look at one another and are puzzled.
I am sure that this divide exists among readers of this blog as well.
Opponents of the traditional orthodox view on this matter
must understand that our opposition to their view is not motivated by hate or
fear. They must also understand
that we will not compromise.
………………………………………………………………………
* Luke 14:26 refers to
loving no one more than Jesus. The
verse reflects an Aramaic understanding of love and hate.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
A Flower Vase on a Grave
As my wife and I drove away from a recent visit to her
parent’s graves, I saw, in the corner of my eye, another couple standing by a
grave. The man looked around to
see if he was being watched and then walked over to another grave. From that grave, the man took a flower
vase and placed it on the grave his wife was viewing.
Besides being petty theft, this was an insult to the person
from whose grave the vase was removed. I also believe that it was an insult to
the person on whose grave the stolen vase was placed. It was as if the man
thought so little of them that he would rather use a stolen vase and flowers
rather than purchase some of his own.
I am sure that this man thought this was a negligible act,
not worthy of a thought. This was
an intentional act, but even unintentional sins are still sins and the wages of
sin is death. How wonderful it is
that Jesus has washed His people clean.
“For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in
one point, he is guilty of all.” James 2:10
“And if a soul sin, and commit any of these things which
are forbidden to be done by the commandments of the LORD; though he wist it
not, yet is he guilty, and shall bear his iniquity.” Leviticus 5:17
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 6:23
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 6:23
Monday, May 27, 2013
Mainstream vs Traditional
Recently, I have
spoken several times about Christians who hold to the traditional faith being
thought of as outside the “mainstream.”
We are often portrayed as “odd,” “eccentric,” “wrong-headed,” “extreme,”
“bigoted,” or “fringe.” Most often
the insults are subtly delivered.
Religious
denominations are spoken of by the “mainstream media” as “mainstream” (meaning
progressive or liberal) or “outside the mainstream.” This places those who are “outside the mainstream” into the
same general category as the numerous obscure or strange sects and cults. It is
an insult and I believe that it is a form of persecution which seeks to force
us to “evolve.” This is another
insult which assumes that we are “cavemen” or “neanderthals.”
Persecution is not
always of the “throw them to the lions” sort. It also exists in the sideways snicker, in the assumption
that traditional Christians are “simple” or intellectually inferior, or that we
are socially backward, or that we are totally outdated dinosaurs not relevant
to the modern world.
AND SADLY … this
patronizing and insulting (I say heretical) thought often comes from the
“mainstream’ churches and from movements such as the Emerging Church. Listen to what the Bible clearly says.
“Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the
common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you
that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto
the saints.” Jude 1:3. Jude was Jesus’s brother.
“Do not be conformed to this age, but be transformed by the
renewing of your mind, so that you may discern what is the good, pleasing, and
perfect will of God.” Romans 12:2
“But though we, or
an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have
preached unto you, let him be accursed.”
Galatians 1:8. The word
which the translators have rendered as “accursed” is, in the Greek, ἀνάθεμα (anathema), from ἀνά (ana),
meaning "on", and τίθημι (tithēmi), meaning "I put." Originally this referred to a gift to God
or to the pagan gods. Echoes of the Hebrew word "herem"
(חרם) referred to something forbidden or
off-limits, because it was dedicated for religious use and not useable in the common
world. (Numbers 18:14;
Leviticus
27:28-29); and hence the idea of “exterminating” or “dead” was
connected with the word. Various translations of the words anathema and herem have included "cursed," "disliked," "loathed," "banned," "excommunicated," "excluded," "denounced," "vehemently rejected," "off limits," and "devoted to evil."
Deuteronomy 7:26 calls a pagan idol a herem. Here it is: “Neither shalt thou bring an abomination into thine house, lest thou be a cursed thing like it: but thou shalt utterly detest it, and thou shalt utterly abhor it; for it is a cursed thing.”
Deuteronomy 7:26 calls a pagan idol a herem. Here it is: “Neither shalt thou bring an abomination into thine house, lest thou be a cursed thing like it: but thou shalt utterly detest it, and thou shalt utterly abhor it; for it is a cursed thing.”
Labels:
anathema,
Bible,
Deuteronomy,
Emergent Christianity,
Galatians,
Greek,
Hebrew,
heresy,
insult,
Jude,
Leviticus,
mainstream churches,
Numbers,
persecution,
Romans
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Boy Scouts to Allow Homosexual Members
The Boy Scouts of America on 23 May 2013 voted (by a 60% to
40% margin) to change the organization’s regulations to allow homosexual boys
to participate and be full members. Homosexual adult leaders will still be
banned. Since the Boy Scouts are a
private organization they were not required to make this change but they have
been under increasingly intense public pressure for years to take this
step. A problem is that many of
the sponsors of scout groups are churches. Not all of them are delighted with this development. The only official church responses so
far are from the Mormons, who say the change will not affect their involvement,
and the Catholics, who say that they need time to consider their response.
My thinking on the issue: the Boy Scouts are a private group
and can do as they wish.
Individual parents and individual denominations, congregations,
synagogues, and mosques should decide for themselves if they wish to continue
their involvement. Hopefully, the
Boy Scouts will allow individual local groups to decide whether or not they
will implement the new policy.
That would spare them the decision of whether or not now to withdraw
from the Scouts altogether.
The pressure on the Scouts and on religious groups has been
subtle and not so subtle. An
example can be found in this article from the USA Today newspaper for Friday 24
May 2013 on page 12A (the editorial page). The editorial calls the prior Boy Scout stance a “wrong-headed
ban on gays,” Two paragraphs later, it says this:
“Much of the angst that has riven the Scouts for the past year can be attributed to Scouting's close affiliation with churches, some with strong tenets against homosexuality. Fully 70% of troops are religiously sponsored.”
The logical implication is that the newspaper’s editorial
staff is insulting the churches by calling them “wrong-headed.”
Labels:
Boy Scouts,
boys,
editorial,
gay,
homosexuality,
insult,
mormons,
mosque,
newspaper,
Roman Catholic Church,
synagogue,
USA Today
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Tell Someone About This Blog
This blog is receiving between 2,000 and 5,000 discrete visits per month. Why not 5,000 to 10,000? Tell your friends, relatives, and fellow church members about the blog. Mention the blog in one of your tweets, on your personal blog, or on your Facebook page.
This is primarily a ministry to Christians but it also is read by persons who are not Christian. There have been visits originating from occultic and pornographic sites. Some readers have been followers of non-Christian religions such as Judaism and Islam.
This blog will never intentionally insult anyone but it also will never back away from telling the Truth. The Good News is for everyone and if only one person comes to Christ because of this blog, the angels will rejoice. (Luke 15:1-10)
This is primarily a ministry to Christians but it also is read by persons who are not Christian. There have been visits originating from occultic and pornographic sites. Some readers have been followers of non-Christian religions such as Judaism and Islam.
This blog will never intentionally insult anyone but it also will never back away from telling the Truth. The Good News is for everyone and if only one person comes to Christ because of this blog, the angels will rejoice. (Luke 15:1-10)
Labels:
angels,
blog,
Blogger,
Christ,
Christian blog,
evangelism,
Facebook,
Good News,
insult,
Islam,
Judaism,
Luke,
non-Christian,
occultism,
pornography,
truth,
Twitter
Thursday, November 11, 2010
A Come to Jesus Moment
This post is about a current American idiomatic phrase: a come to Jesus moment. I had heard this phrase used before in a sports context, then later in business and in politics. I had an idea what it meant but decided to investigate it, so I went to the Urban Dictionary (http://www.urbandictionary.com/ )
On this website, Internet respondents can submit their interpretation(s) of current slang (popular "street" idioms). Besides the traditional religious interpretation of the phrase, there were several fanciful, sarcastic, and/or vulgar comments.
The most accurate interpretation of this phrase seems to be one of being called into a meeting in which one is severely criticized and possibly threatened with strict punishment for one's actions or attitudes. The intent of the meeting is to produce an emotional response which produces a complete change in behavior and/or attitude.
This seems to play into a popular misconception of Jesus, and "religion" in general, as stuffy, unpleasant, hypercritical, prudish, threatening, and disapproving. This is an insulting stereotype.
On this website, Internet respondents can submit their interpretation(s) of current slang (popular "street" idioms). Besides the traditional religious interpretation of the phrase, there were several fanciful, sarcastic, and/or vulgar comments.
The most accurate interpretation of this phrase seems to be one of being called into a meeting in which one is severely criticized and possibly threatened with strict punishment for one's actions or attitudes. The intent of the meeting is to produce an emotional response which produces a complete change in behavior and/or attitude.
This seems to play into a popular misconception of Jesus, and "religion" in general, as stuffy, unpleasant, hypercritical, prudish, threatening, and disapproving. This is an insulting stereotype.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Book Comment: Ethics Without God
Ethics Without God, by Kai Nielsen, admits that a reasonable person can be a Christian but adds that a reasonable person who has had a full education cannot be a Christian. So, though Nielsen goes out of his way to seem reasonable, in the end his judgement of Christianity and Christians is an insult. He rejects the basic assumptions of Christianity as unnecessary and illogical. He believes that secularization is inevitable "as we move away from a peasant society."
Nielsen rejects the idea that only religion, and more specifically Christianity, can provide a purpose in life. He agrees that a life with no purpose would be awful. He finds purpose in science, logic, and ethical behavior and says that Christianity has "incoherence" in it. Another insult said with a sweet smile.
"Perhaps we have even more reason to love each other if there is no God for then the only thing we have is each other."
Nielsen, Kai, Ethics Without God (Rev. ed.: Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY, 1990)
Nielsen rejects the idea that only religion, and more specifically Christianity, can provide a purpose in life. He agrees that a life with no purpose would be awful. He finds purpose in science, logic, and ethical behavior and says that Christianity has "incoherence" in it. Another insult said with a sweet smile.
"Perhaps we have even more reason to love each other if there is no God for then the only thing we have is each other."
Nielsen, Kai, Ethics Without God (Rev. ed.: Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY, 1990)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)