Today is Easter! He is Risen!
This week, on our block, there was a children's Easter Egg Hunt party. The flier which was sent out to announce the party had, in large bold letters, "BYOB!" Then the anagram was explained: "Bring your own basket." Then, in parentheses: (Adults, bring your own bottle if you wish.)
Some Christians believe that the current observance of Easter in the West is totally pagan. What do bunny rabbits, baby chickens, and Easter Eggs have to do with the celebration of the Resurrection of the Lord Jesus from the dead? Others believe that the secular trappings of Easter are harmless and a fun time for children. Regardless of what you think about the current Western observance of Easter, why would adults feel that they must bring alcoholic beverages to every gathering? Even to a children's party?
Showing posts with label secularism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label secularism. Show all posts
Sunday, April 21, 2019
Friday, February 10, 2012
Secular Christians
"I am grieved by nit-picking, small-minded Christians, and deeply troubled about shallow Christians who think everything is black and white, who have simple answers for life's most difficult questions. But I'm outraged by "secular" Christians who have been fully immersed in the moral relativism of a post-Christian world." Gary Kinnaman
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
What They Think of Us: Someone Finally Said It Out Loud
Someone finally said it out loud. So, they think we are bigots.
As I have said repeatedly, this is not, never has been, and never will be a political blog but sometimes my comments may be about subjects which touch on politics. Recently Leonard Pitts , a columnist for the Miami Herald newspaper, insulted every Christian who opposes same-sex marriage on scriptural grounds. In criticizing presidential candidate Rick Santorum, Pitts calls Santorum a bigot because of his opposition to same-sex marriage based on "lame arguments built of straw and fear." In effect, Pitts has said that to hold the position makes one a bigot. I don't believe that Pitts actually intended to insult such a large group of people although his statements could be viewed as part of the obviously growing secular hostility toward historical Christianity.
As I have said repeatedly, this is not, never has been, and never will be a political blog but sometimes my comments may be about subjects which touch on politics. Recently Leonard Pitts , a columnist for the Miami Herald newspaper, insulted every Christian who opposes same-sex marriage on scriptural grounds. In criticizing presidential candidate Rick Santorum, Pitts calls Santorum a bigot because of his opposition to same-sex marriage based on "lame arguments built of straw and fear." In effect, Pitts has said that to hold the position makes one a bigot. I don't believe that Pitts actually intended to insult such a large group of people although his statements could be viewed as part of the obviously growing secular hostility toward historical Christianity.
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Film Comment: Rubber
Rubber (2010) is a film only a true film geek (like me) could appreciate. It is an absurdist horror film about a serial killer who is a rubber automobile tire. This sounds silly, and would lead one to expect something similar to the inspired insanity of the comedic cult classic, Attack of the Killer Tomatoes. Rubber is not a comedy.
Robert (the tire) rises up from the desert sand one day and stands up on his tread. Then he starts to roll. Along his randomly meandering way he learns that he can, by intense concentration, cause things (tin cans, birds, rabbits) to explode. It is only one small step up from rabbits to people. The killings are depicted in all the gore and visual nastiness of the most extreme horror films.
Killing randomly as he goes, Robert becomes obsessed with, and begins to follow, a young woman who is driving alone on the desert highway.
Robert, of course, is not real, he is a character in a film which is being observed by a group of people, the audience, standing in the desert sand, using binoculars to observe the events as they progress.
The audience is totally helpless, exposed to the elements and the desert, so engrossed in watching the action that they fail to take care of their own needs. No one even thinks to eat. Late that night they all fall asleep on the desert sand. When the members of the audience wake up, they are very hungry and selfishly fight among themselves for their share when their desert guide throws a cooked turkey into the sand. The guide doesn't tell them that he has loaded the turkey with poison and they all die a painful death. Only an old man in a wheelchair survives, because he was suspicious and refused to eat the turkey.
Of course, none of this makes any sense. That's the entire point of the film. In the first scene, one of the main characters tells us, "The film you are about to see is an homage to "no reason," that most powerful element of style."
The internet is buzzing with discussions about this film. Most say that this is not about the tire at all, but is about the relationship between movies and their audiences, more specifically, how skilled directors can draw their audiences in and cause them to become involved in the film, in some cases becoming part of the film. I see something deeper, I see "no reason."
We all have underlying world-views, presuppositions we use to make sense of the world around us. In the case of this film. "no reason" is the real message of this film. Life is meaningless. There is no purpose. There is no absolute truth. The only constant is randomness. Whatever happens, happens for no reason. Whatever one believes or does is acceptable and no one has any basis for questioning the actions or beliefs of anyone else. Does this sound familiar? It is the aggressively and rapidly growing worldview known as post-modernism, the logical and inevitable end result of secular humanism. Though it grew out of naturalism, rationalism, and humanism, it declares all religious, philosophical, and political paths to be equally valid, even when their truth claims are mutually exclusive. In its declaration that all "truths"are true, it in effect declares that there is no such thing as truth, there are multiple truths. Your truth might not be my truth. Nonsense rules. Logic and rational thought are rejected.
The Bible has an answer to this nonsense:
"And as they spake unto the people, the priests, and the captain of the temple, and the Sadducees, came upon them, Being grieved that they taught the people, and preached through Jesus the resurrection from the dead. And they laid hands on them, and put them in hold unto the next day: for it was now eventide. Howbeit many of them which heard the word believed; and the number of the men was about five thousand.
And it came to pass on the morrow, that their rulers, and elders, and scribes, And Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem. And when they had set them in the midst, they asked, By what power, or by what name, have ye done this? Then Peter, filled with the Holy Ghost, said unto them, Ye rulers of the people, and elders of Israel, If we this day be examined of the good deed done to the impotent man, by what means he is made whole; Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus"
Acts 4:1-13.
Robert (the tire) rises up from the desert sand one day and stands up on his tread. Then he starts to roll. Along his randomly meandering way he learns that he can, by intense concentration, cause things (tin cans, birds, rabbits) to explode. It is only one small step up from rabbits to people. The killings are depicted in all the gore and visual nastiness of the most extreme horror films.
Killing randomly as he goes, Robert becomes obsessed with, and begins to follow, a young woman who is driving alone on the desert highway.
Robert, of course, is not real, he is a character in a film which is being observed by a group of people, the audience, standing in the desert sand, using binoculars to observe the events as they progress.
The audience is totally helpless, exposed to the elements and the desert, so engrossed in watching the action that they fail to take care of their own needs. No one even thinks to eat. Late that night they all fall asleep on the desert sand. When the members of the audience wake up, they are very hungry and selfishly fight among themselves for their share when their desert guide throws a cooked turkey into the sand. The guide doesn't tell them that he has loaded the turkey with poison and they all die a painful death. Only an old man in a wheelchair survives, because he was suspicious and refused to eat the turkey.
Of course, none of this makes any sense. That's the entire point of the film. In the first scene, one of the main characters tells us, "The film you are about to see is an homage to "no reason," that most powerful element of style."
The internet is buzzing with discussions about this film. Most say that this is not about the tire at all, but is about the relationship between movies and their audiences, more specifically, how skilled directors can draw their audiences in and cause them to become involved in the film, in some cases becoming part of the film. I see something deeper, I see "no reason."
We all have underlying world-views, presuppositions we use to make sense of the world around us. In the case of this film. "no reason" is the real message of this film. Life is meaningless. There is no purpose. There is no absolute truth. The only constant is randomness. Whatever happens, happens for no reason. Whatever one believes or does is acceptable and no one has any basis for questioning the actions or beliefs of anyone else. Does this sound familiar? It is the aggressively and rapidly growing worldview known as post-modernism, the logical and inevitable end result of secular humanism. Though it grew out of naturalism, rationalism, and humanism, it declares all religious, philosophical, and political paths to be equally valid, even when their truth claims are mutually exclusive. In its declaration that all "truths"are true, it in effect declares that there is no such thing as truth, there are multiple truths. Your truth might not be my truth. Nonsense rules. Logic and rational thought are rejected.
The Bible has an answer to this nonsense:
"And as they spake unto the people, the priests, and the captain of the temple, and the Sadducees, came upon them, Being grieved that they taught the people, and preached through Jesus the resurrection from the dead. And they laid hands on them, and put them in hold unto the next day: for it was now eventide. Howbeit many of them which heard the word believed; and the number of the men was about five thousand.
And it came to pass on the morrow, that their rulers, and elders, and scribes, And Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem. And when they had set them in the midst, they asked, By what power, or by what name, have ye done this? Then Peter, filled with the Holy Ghost, said unto them, Ye rulers of the people, and elders of Israel, If we this day be examined of the good deed done to the impotent man, by what means he is made whole; Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus"
Acts 4:1-13.
Friday, February 18, 2011
Evangelism In France
France is a largely secular country but has a long and prominent place in the history of Christianity. Roman Catholicism and Protestantism have both declined to shadows of their former selves. At the moment, the fastest growing religion in France is Islam. The European Christian Mission (ECM) aims to change this.
As the ECM website states, "God has not abandoned France." In the last thirty-five years, over one thousand new evangelical churches have been planted, bringing the total to approximately twenty four hundred. Many rural areas still have no evangelical church.
ECM has six missionary teams in France, mainly in the Loire Valley, Paris, and Marseilles.
As the ECM website states, "God has not abandoned France." In the last thirty-five years, over one thousand new evangelical churches have been planted, bringing the total to approximately twenty four hundred. Many rural areas still have no evangelical church.
ECM has six missionary teams in France, mainly in the Loire Valley, Paris, and Marseilles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
