Extrabiblical Evidences of Biblical Persons, Places, or Events: The Pilate Inscription

The only known ancient inscription which mentions the Roman governor Pontius Pilatus was found in June 1961 in Caesarea-on-the-Sea (Caesarea Maritima) by Dr. Antonio Frova in the ruins of the Fourth Century Roman amphitheater at the site. 

The original flat stone was part of a dedicatory plaque for a temple dating from 26 to 36 AD. In the Fourth Century, the stone was used as one building block for a set of stairs in a theater.  The original inscription is now housed in the Israel Museum in Jerusalem. 

This phenomenon is seen repeatedly in the Middle East. Many ancient stones were pulled from ruins of ancient towns and cities and re-used as building blocks for later buildings.

The inscription reads as:

 Line One:  TIBERIEUM,,

 Line Two:  (PON) TIUS

 Line Three:  (PRAEF) ECTUS IUDA (EAE)

The original article cited is here.

Bible Printer's Errors: The Pilate's Tile Bible

These Bible Printers Errors are all in the English language.  They are from printed editions of the King James Version of the Bible created during the time when the printed text had to be hand set using individual letter keys. There are probably just as many variant printed texts in other languages created during the same time period.  Proofreading is very important.  Sometimes one word, or even one letter, changes the entire meaning of a passage.  The following is an example to prove the point.

WHAT IT SHOULD HAVE SAID:  

“And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.”

WHAT IT SAID:

“And Pilate wrote a tile, and put it on the cross. And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS."

This is from the 1612 “Pilate’s tile” Bible. The text is from John 19:19.

Emphasis on Christian Education

We have allowed the progressives (This is their current self identification. They have also been known as liberals and relativists) to define themselves as "mainstream" or "moderate." They insult historical Christianity by labelling it as backward, racist, reactionary, homophobic, sexist, intolerant,  irrelevant to the modern world, judgmental, imperialistic, sexist, anti-intellectual, etc., etc., etc. You get the picture.

Historical Christianity is none of these things. Part of the reason that this insulting situation has arisen is that many churches have not adequately fulfilled their function to hand on the faith to the following generations. A helpful start would be a renewed emphasis on Christian education in history, doctrine, interpretation,  apologetics, and application of the Christian message in day to day life. We need to be equipping modern day Christian warriors. (Ephesians 6:13-18)

(... but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence; 1 Peter 3:15)

Historical Christianity is the "mainstream." Those who wish to redefine the faith are the ones who are creating another doctrine. Many have already crossed the threshold and have effectively left the mainstream historical faith.

"Scripture quotations taken from the New American Standard Bible®,
Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973,
1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation
Used by permission." (www.Lockman.org)